Contexts: 200 Years of the Present. Constellation 1

Nation-building and civic sovereignty

Photo: Hans D. Christ

While the aristocrats based their power on the blood that flowed through their veins thanks to the “divine right” of kings, the emerging educated and propertied bourgeoisie of the 19th century needed other forms of legitimation and new identity-forming narratives. In addition to growing economic and political power, nation-building, based on the idea of civil birthright, played a central role. Culture and history provided the necessary narratives of a supposedly homogeneous community: an “imagined community,” as Benedict Anderson put it. In this context, the visual arts became a foil for national identity, individual freedom, and liberal markets. At the same time, national constructs are constructs of difference, based on the inventions of gender and race systematized in the 19th century. These constructs engender the “unresolved problems of civil society” just as much as they engender the violence of slavery and colonies. A central cultural instrument in the formation of European difference were the world's fairs.

Not neutral?

Photo: Hans D. Christ

Under the directorship of Uwe M. Schneede (1969–1973) and Tilman Osterwold (1973–1993), the WKV's program became politicized in the wake of the 1968 movements. The politically activist art of the so-called interwar modernism (Grosz, Heartfield), the problematic legacy of art from fascism, the “East-West conflict” or the emancipatory and aesthetic potential of revolutionary movements were discussed. As Osterwold emphasized in 1976: “Presenting the connections between cultural and political processes has been one of the main objectives of the Württembergischer Kunstverein's exhibition activities for many years.” With Andreas Jürgensen (2001–2003), institutional critique came to the fore. From 2005, the socio-political contexts of the arts were reflected from the perspectives of “non-Western,” feminist, and other critical practices. The history of the WKV since the 1960s shows that it has repeatedly taken a clear stand on current political grievances.

Methods for disrupting linear thinking?

Photo: Hans D. Christ

In its approach to 200 years of the present, the WKV seeks to disrupt linear conceptions of time and thinking through anachronistic modes of narration based on ruptures, digressions, gaps, and overlaps. The methods of a number of artists who have exhibited at WKV are one of the starting points and learning models: from Ferdinand Krivets spiral-shaped text-based works, to Ricardo Basbaum's deriving space diagram, to Anna Oppermann's ensemble art. In 1979, she said of her works: “What is not recognizable in the illustrations [of my works] is that not only different pictorial levels, levels of reality, forms of expression, and media are arranged together here, but also representations – visualized or articulated – of different states of consciousness, levels of consciousness, reference systems (evaluation spaces), meta-levels. In less pretentious, but less precise terms, one could say: There coexist the open and the closed, the unfinished and the finished, the irrational and the rational, the trivial and the elitist, the private and the general, the foolish and the brutal, the traditional and the progressive, the mysterious and the clear, the stupid and the clever, the kitschy and the sensual, the idyllic and the abstract, the theoretical (scientific).”

Location

Photo: Hans D. Christ

?The term “location” designates the spatial relationship between things – a constellation. The WKV is located in the center of a typical Central European city. Housed in a representative building itself, it is surrounded by a central square (Schlossplatz), institutions of state politics (state parliament, new castle), and high culture (opera, theater, art museum), symbols of power (jubilee column for King William I), as well as commerce (Königstraße), recreation (park), and spectacle (Schlossplatz, park). At the same time, these spaces are characterized by the use of diverse public spheres and economies, by political struggles, and by police control and racial profiling.

“[...] as if flies had given birth to elephants.”

Photo: Hans D. Christ

?“The finiteness of the individual human life refutes property as a constitutive principle of human coexistence with the same deadly certainty with which the finiteness of the globe refutes expansion as a principle of political action.” (Hannah Arendt, in: Elements and Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951)?

Alice Widensohler

Photo: Hans D. Christ

?(* 1898 in Hamburg, † 1969 in Stuttgart)?1946–1965: Managing Director and Curator of the WKV?Alice Widensohler was the first woman to head the WKV. She was hired as managing director and curator after the Second World War. In this role, she took over a pile of rubble, had to search for temporary exhibition spaces, and to organize the reconstruction of the Kunstverein’s building at Schellingstraße (1888–1913 seat of the WKV) and later at Schlossplatz. After the WKV moved into the new building at Schlossplatz in 1961 and the situation had stabilized, men took over the leadership again from 1965 to 2005. In the commemorative publication for the 150th anniversary of the WKV (1977), Widensohler's exhibition program is placed in the context of the belated nationwide embrace of modernism. This abbreviated account ignores the lasting impact that her program evidently had on the collections of the Staatsgalerie and Galerie der Stadt Stuttgart, today's Kunstmuseum.?The notes on the exhibition posters from 1946 and 1947 are interesting from a contemporary historical point of view: “Published with the permission of the Publications Control Branch, ICD, OMG Württemberg-Baden.” The ICD, Information Control Division, was a censorship department of the American occupation zone. OMG stands for Office of Military Government for Germany.

Prospects of Future Connections (Post-War Contexts)

Photo: Hans D. Christ

László Moholy-Nagy: Military Technology?
“Moholy-Nagy was trained in the application of a range of technologies during his work in reconnaissance, from telegraphy and telephony to the use of scopes and magnifying glasses, which undoubtedly influenced his later work. Military strategists and avant-gardists alike recognized the urgency of training people to grasp and respond to the objective truth brought to light by technology.” (Joyce Tsai, László Moholy-Nagy. Painting after Photography, Washington, USA, 2018, p. 47)

New York School?
In the field of fine arts, Mrs. Moholy-Nagy appeared before a German audience to speak about the work of her late husband, László, and the direction taken by the New Bauhaus in Chicago (1950). Her lecture, according to a journalist, “was a very informative contribution to our only sketchy concept of American culture and art. This concept was deepened by an exhibition of abstract paintings from the Guggenheim Museum, the first government-sponsored appearance of the New York School, also known as abstract expressionism.” (Joyce Tsai, László Moholy-Nagy. Painting after Photography, Washington, USA, 2018, p. 34)??

Fernand Léger / László Moholy-Nagy: Free Markets?
“Léger and I [Moholy-Nagy] reminisced today over a bottle of rosé at the Chicago Art Club's gruesome banquet in honor of the Container Corporation's poster exhibition. Léger did a splendid job of imitating the keynote speaker, who introduced himself as a popularity researcher at a large advertising agency. He proudly and sarcastically reported how the designs by Moore, Helion, Kepes, Bayer and other artists were in plus or minus points of popularity with commercial artists. We were obviously both ashamed that we had protested against this travesty only from under the table. It is quite clear to me that the advertising directors of large companies only buy famous artists to make advertisement after advertisement and thus disguise the mediocrity of their usual ads. The provocation of modern art is constantly dulled by checkbooks and cocktail parties. Am I going down the same path?” (Letter from to László to Sibyl Moholy-Nagy, 26.4.1944, p. 177)??

Freedom and Nation ‘Congress for Cultural Freedom’
?“During the height of the Cold War, the US government invested enormous sums in a secret program that served the cultural propaganda of Western Europe. It was controlled by the CIA. The centerpiece of this secret campaign was the Congress for Cultural Freedom, which took place between 1950 and 1967. Henry Kissinger called it a kind of aristocracy, committed to serving the nation and therefore guided by principles beyond partisan loyalties.” (from: Frances Stonor Saunders, Who Pays the Bill. The CIA and Culture in the Cold War, 2001, p. 13ff)??Obsolescence?The First World War was the first war dominated by media and technology in the most horrific way. “Crowds, gases, electrical forces were thrown into the open field, high-frequency currents traversed the landscape, new stars rose in the sky, airspace and ocean depths roared with propellers, and everywhere shafts were dug into the earth.” (Walter Benjamin, One-Way Street, Berlin 1928, p. 81)

deueng
searchImprint
instagramfacebooktwitteryoutube
Schlossplatz 2
D-70173 Stuttgart
Fon: +49 (0)711 - 22 33 70
Fax: +49 (0)711-22 33 791
zentrale@wkv-stuttgart.de
Württembergischer Kunstverein Stuttgart